BrianI just checked the page with the ...

(Reply to "MECA-OM Images")

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | Next >>
Author Message
LWS [TypeKey Profile Page]

Posts: 1675

Reply: 84



PostPosted: July 26, 2008 1:12 AM 

Brian

I just checked the page with the table again and all reference to rotational position 13411 is gone. It has a 3411 rotational position but that is reference, not to OM 57, but to OM 27, luckily both are strong magnets.

I'm almost certain that I saw the 13411 rotational position and OM 57 when I first checked that document.

Winston

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | Next >>

The above reply is only one reply in this discussion. Click here to view the entire "MECA-OM Images" discussion .











Subroutine _hdlr_comment_author_link redefined at lib/MT/Template/ContextHandlers.pm line 2467.