I hope it was my comments that drove Fred to as...

I hope it was my comments that drove Fred to aspire to 'interplanetary critique' status today, and not so much the strange imaging techniques.
I could have posted just the very nice color still side view of the complex, organized object, but, as Fred points out above, so many cannot really 'see' and translate the details to a particular set of ideas, historical images recollections, or even to current image releases. I was a little deficient in not issuing the sol date, but I am now working on the original image sources by back-tracking from Stu's site animation. Many do not give all the details we would want in each post. Hope this was not offensive in that regard.
I really can't apologize for the simplification, nor the bright colors in my alterations. They are used to determine the absolute value of the brightness and color tones in the images. Some missing subtle information can be drawn from the techniques.
What is your take, Fred? Are these two days items really the same item type, or can we be seeing again, a one-in-a-million chance occurrence on Mars, of a type never seen in Earth photos?
.

.
The 3D simulation/translation of the earlier 'cantilever tip' item, from a prior days OM.
Are these sufficient to give motivation for a treasure hunt for more?