Hi Barsoomer,Re 391. I follow your poin...

(Reply to "Phoenix on Mars")

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | Next >>
Author Message
brian [TypeKey Profile Page]

Posts: 19

Reply: 394



PostPosted: September 6, 2008 9:06 AM 

Hi Barsoomer,
Re 391. I follow your point. If there were anhydrous perchlorates (or other anhydrous salts) present then they could bound water molecules as hydrates. For example lithium perchlorate trihydrate - LiClO4.3H2O. But the regolith never gets the thermal energy necessary to remove the water of hydration so I can't see how the cycle Zent was referring to could be attributed to perchlorates.

My feeling is that the regolith has thermal inertia characteristics much greater than modelled. Even a few centimeters coverage is enough to protect the permafrost ice. Has anyone seen any results on the soil temperature or thermal properties of the probe?

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | Next >>

The above reply is only one reply in this discussion. Click here to view the entire "Phoenix on Mars" discussion .











Subroutine _hdlr_comment_author_link redefined at lib/MT/Template/ContextHandlers.pm line 2467.