Hi Marsbug.In the report they talk about...

(Reply to "Phoenix on Mars")

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | Next >>
Author Message
brian [TypeKey Profile Page]

Posts: 19

Reply: 390



PostPosted: September 5, 2008 10:17 AM 

Hi Marsbug.
In the report they talk about relative humidity which is the partial pressure of the water vapour divided by the saturation vapour pressure of water in the Martian atmosphere at the reading air temperature. But Relative Humidity is temperature dependent and would be expected to vary significantly as a function of the daily temperature swings at the Phoenix site. Zent was reported as saying that the variation in relative humidity ‘suggests there's a lot of moisture moving in and out of the soil’ so I guess we have to assume that the relative humidity change is greater than what would be expected for stable water content. It would have made more sense if they had used Absolute Humidity being the quantity of water in a unit volume of air.

From the article they seem to be expecting H2O molecules adhering to the surface of soil particles as is the case with permafrost on Earth. They are not there so perhaps the regolith really is hydrophobic. Or maybe only the grains right at the surface are affected.

Thanks for the guidance on the liquid film at the ice/vapour interface at depressed temperatures. I had thought that such would only exist when the kinetic energy of translation was effectively equal to the Van der Walls forces. Live and learn.

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | Next >>

The above reply is only one reply in this discussion. Click here to view the entire "Phoenix on Mars" discussion .











Subroutine _hdlr_comment_author_link redefined at lib/MT/Template/ContextHandlers.pm line 2467.