I got to wondering if the elevation and aziumth...

(Reply to "Phoenix on Mars")

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | Next >>
Author Message
hortonheardawho [TypeKey Profile Page]

Posts: 388

Reply: 196



PostPosted: June 26, 2008 9:46 AM 

I got to wondering if the elevation and aziumth values in the JPG metadata reflected the misalignment of the filters -- and they apparently do!

The A, B , C filters in this image have elevation and azimuth values:


  • -18.161, 122.59

  • -18.1591,122.588

  • -18.1587,122.589

SO, the SSI camera seems to know where it is pointed to 7 decimal places when the exposure is taken -- and so either it is commanded to misalign the filters -- or the command sequence is first point to some specific value ( like, say -18.16, 122.59 ) and then take a sequence of exposures, noting the actual pointing -- or perhaps the actual pointing is calculated from the images once they are downlinked???

So I wonder which it is: obfiscation or lander movement -- or some other effect? All of the above???

As an aside, the local times for the A, B, C exposures were 18:43:59, 18:44:49, 18:45:41 with exposures of 1.0455, 1.1628 and 3.0957 seconds.

I wonder what factors control the time between filter exposures? Is 50 seconds a minimum?

Lots of questions. Damn few answers.

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | Next >>

The above reply is only one reply in this discussion. Click here to view the entire "Phoenix on Mars" discussion .











Subroutine _hdlr_comment_author_link redefined at lib/MT/Template/ContextHandlers.pm line 2467.