Great. I was thinking this was as a 'bounce, so...

(Reply to "Interference in Posting Yet Again")

Page 1 |
Author Message
danajohnson0

Posts: 487

Reply: 4



PostPosted: April 4, 2006 9:46 PM 

Great. I was thinking this was as a 'bounce, something held only here in limbo land, and not to be seen again. In the past I have given the attempt to establish a new repeat page access, and cut-and-paste transferred the message , then deleted(closed) the first window, hoping to sidestep a IP address 'lockout' or other measure. That worked a few times, but seldom, and I'll presume the entries are being transferred in the future even though the transfer bar does not arise to indicate that.
Very appreciative of the detailed explanation. I was worried about the poster and content, but we have a wide variety of persons on this blog, and I have heard the 'music' more than once for each song we hear.
Frankly I agree with the dire concerns of a person who sees possible calamity in the simplest of technology areas, and I will follow the argument even though I do believe that the natural world still prevails as a non-intelligent machine. I see pattern but not intelligence, and I would trust a single human before the entire natural world. Between the two 'leaning' intrigues I have little confidence that problems will be solved before or as they are developing.
The graphics was rather irritating, so I chose to become involved.
Thanks for the help. I have never approached the Flikr problem as yet. Found a few additional hosts of photos, but the posting may bring nag ads and other problems.

Is there an interest by others in a possible Stardust section, or subsection, as the program should be live this next week?

Page 1 |

The above reply is only one reply in this discussion. Click here to view the entire "Interference in Posting Yet Again" discussion .











Subroutine _hdlr_comment_author_link redefined at lib/MT/Template/ContextHandlers.pm line 2467.