| Author |
Message |
hortonheardawho
Posts: 388
Reply: 461
|
Posted: September 23, 2008 8:03 AM |
|
|
sol 117 soil that was under rock "Headless":

with comment links to RAC 3D and location 3D.
I smiled when I saw this picture. Looks a lot like "icy soil". |
|
 |
LWS
Posts: 1675
Reply: 462
|
Posted: September 23, 2008 12:35 PM |
|
|
Hi Hort
I wonder if this adds support to the second Phoenix Team hypothesis "An alternative possibility, if the icy layer were found closer to the surface under a rock, could be the rock collecting moisture from the atmosphere, with the moisture becoming part of the icy layer".
If this is so how does it square with the TECP results? and the possibility of an active water cycle with the atmosphere.
Fred; I'm looking at you.
Winston |
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 463
|
Posted: September 23, 2008 3:52 PM |
|
|
I did not think an active hydro-cycle was in question. We have seen frost and snow on the surface. If they are looking at other possibilities then they are ignoring the visible data.
Fred
|
|
 |
Barsoomer
Posts: 1
Reply: 464
|
Posted: September 23, 2008 5:08 PM |
|
|
Interesting post here:
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=5420&view=findpost&p=126600
Especially this link:
http://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/meeting/sep-08/P_Smith_Phoenix_results.ppt
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 465
|
Posted: September 23, 2008 5:35 PM |
|
|
Barsommer,
I can not hit that link. I get the red hat. If it has anything to do with hydro-cycle cut and paste.
Fred
|
|
 |
hortonheardawho
Posts: 388
Reply: 466
|
Posted: September 23, 2008 7:17 PM |
|
|
Very interesting power point presentation by Dr Smith.
The Pros and Cons for Habitility included the pro of "organics??" and a con of "no clear organic signature". Does that mean that some signal was detected?
His slide on WCL results included the interesting facts that concentrated perchlorates lower the freezing point of water to -70C - and that perchlorate reducing bacteria exist on Earth. Also was the result "no sulfates!" Why the "!"?
The TEGA results list was quite short - and paradoxial: No ice in surface sample, ice at 5 cm, CO2 and H2O released between 200 and 1000 C and, my favorite, "Minerals created in a liquid water environment"
The entire slide show did not mention the AFM even once. So, either it is a total failure and has become an "un-instrument" or it's results are not yet understood -- and in total keeping with the "It we don't know what it is then it ain't real" philosophy of the mission.
There was a Energy Available graph that shows when various heaters will be turned off. The last to go will be the SSI and MET heaters around sol 160. |
|
 |
mann
Posts: xxx
Reply: 467
|
Posted: September 24, 2008 12:10 PM |
|
|
Seems as they do have some organic results.
No sulfates! reduction at the shallow subsurface?
sulfur, and sulfides ?
The lack of information, might be that they do not know whats goin on whatsover. |
|
 |
Barsoomer
Posts: 1
Reply: 468
|
Posted: September 24, 2008 3:21 PM |
|
|
http://archive.seti.org/pdfs/csc-Aug6.pdf
This is a talk abstract that suggests the interior of hygroscopic crystals might provide a possible habitat for photosynthetic bacteria in arid locations.
Note that perchlorates tend to be hygroscopic. I wonder if any types of perchlorate crystals can be identified in the OM images?
|
|
 |
hortonheardawho
Posts: 388
Reply: 469
|
Posted: September 24, 2008 4:48 PM |
|
|
It looks like some more "icy soil"? was collected and delivered to TEGA? Er, there seem to be two unopened doors. One for the OFB ( organic free blank ) and one for???
The clock is running out in the overtime, so the coach should call for a "Hail Mary" play and load'er up with the soil under the rock known as "Headless". ( At least that's what I would do coaching from the comfort of my recliner. ) |
|
 |
Barsoomer
Posts: 1
Reply: 470
|
Posted: September 25, 2008 3:21 PM |
|
|
As everyone knows, the Phoenix team will give a press conference next Monday at 11:00am PDT.
Any suggestions for questions we would like to be asked by some press member?
Here is my list:
1. Why have no more AFM images been released beyond the first? Is it due to technical problems?
2. Has the team identified the ribbon-like feature in the Sol 105 OM images? Is it something from the lander?
3. Did the TEGA calorimeter show any sign of exothermic reactions?
4. Did TEGA detect any evolved nitrogen? Any signature suggestive of organic material?
5. Has the team identified any specific perchlorate compounds, e.g. sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, or ammonium perchlorate? (Have any crystals of such been identified in the OM?)
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 471
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 472
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 473
|
Posted: September 25, 2008 4:37 PM |
|
|
Edit that boys.
Fred |
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 474
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 475
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 476
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 477
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 478
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 479
|
|
 |
Fred
Posts: xxx
Reply: 480
|
|
 |