Not Mars

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next
Author Message
Ixt







PostPosted: February 4, 2007 3:46 PM 

I have just come across this report which I would like to draw your attention too not Mars related but rather unusual.
Maybe you know about it allready I just came across it by accident today its a Pdf file and can be accessed from the link below.
This is not woo woo stuff. Smile

http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/Cometa.htm
In 1999 an important document was published in France entitled, UFOs and Defense: What must we be prepared for? ("Les Ovni Et La Defense: A quoi doit-on se préparer?"). This ninety-page report is the result of an in-depth study of UFOs, covering many aspects of the subject, especially questions of national defense. The study was carried out over several years by an independent group of former "auditors" at the Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense, or IHEDN, and by qualified experts from various fields. Before its public release, it has been sent to French President Jacques Chirac and to Prime Minister Lionel Jospin. The report is prefaced by General Bernard Norlain of the Air Force, former Director of IHEDN, and it begins with a preamble by André Lebeau, former President of the National Center for Space Studies (Centre National D’études Spatiales), or CNES, the French equivalent of NASA. The group itself, collective author of the report, is an association of experts, many of whom are or have been auditors of IHEDN, and it is presided over by General Denis Letty of the Air Force, former auditor (FA) of IHEDN.

.............................................


n its final recommendations, COMETA stresses again the need to:

Inform all decision-makers and persons in positions of responsibility.
Reinforce means of investigation and study at SEPRA.
Consider whether UFO detection been taken into account by agencies engaged in surveillance of space.
Create a strategic committee at the highest state level.
Undertake diplomatic action with the Unites States for cooperation on this most important question.
Study measures which might be necessary in case of emergencies.
Finally, this document is accompanied by seven interesting appendices which are worth reading even by seasoned ufologists:

Radar detection in France
Observations by astronomers
Life in the Universe
Colonization of space
The Roswell case and possible disinformation
Antiquity of the UFO phenomenon and elements for a chronology.
Reflection on various psychological, sociological and political aspects of the UFO phenomenon.

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 1



PostPosted: February 4, 2007 3:54 PM 

While am at it there is this too .
Emerging Possibilities for Space Propulsion Breakthroughs
[link]

Henry Author Profile Page


Posts: 2896

Reply: 2



PostPosted: February 6, 2007 3:12 AM 

Thanks, Ixt!

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 3



PostPosted: February 11, 2007 5:22 AM 

I have spent the last few days watching some videos about some of our mad scientists as they were thought to be, claiming to build antigravity saucers, some of the stories were great fun to hear especially Prof.John Searl.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Searl

Now these ideas are much more mainstream and heres an interview I just came across with
Dr. Martin Tajmar.

"In our exclusive STAIF 2006 interview, Dr. Martin Tajmar joins us to speak about his theoretical research into FTL, Warp-Drive, and ... all » Antigravity technology. Tajmar works at ARC Seibersdorf in Austria, which subcontracts to the European Space Agency (ESA) for a number of innovative new technology projects."

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8222045907997981867&q=antigravity&hl=en

dx Author Profile Page


Posts: 1661

Reply: 4



PostPosted: February 12, 2007 10:03 PM 

Ixt>>>

thanks for those video leads...I needed that.

yt
dx

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 5



PostPosted: February 13, 2007 12:40 AM 

Glad you enjoyed it DX I see so much interesting stuff at least I think so, I would love to share some of them but its tricky on a Mars forum .
I have just been going through Carl Sagans videos they are great especially for non experts like me, he is very watchable . Smile
I have been asking all the likely older people I meet if they remember the BBC series on John Searl one guy thought he had seen it but its was so long ago I doubt I will find anyone ,its a shame the footage was lost .

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 6



PostPosted: March 6, 2007 2:41 AM 

I don't know why the Electric model thread failed but I will try again here as its an interesting idea.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374

There are no ‘Black Holes’, there is no ‘dark matter’, comets are not ‘dirty snowballs’, the sun is not a ‘nuclear furnace’. THUNDERBOLTS ... all » challenges our fundamental assumptions about the workings of the universe, and then offers an alternative vision. Born of empirical science, this vision is startling in its common sense simplicity, and stunning in its reach and ability to make comprehensible both age-old and modern-day mysteries.

Recent discoveries in space have amazed and perplexed scientists. Current popular theories in the sciences can neither predict nor explain the phenomena we are now observing. In THUNDERBOLTS, American mythologist David Talbott and Australian physicist Wallace Thornhill and their associates propose a new theory which can both predict and explain these phenomena.
5,000 year old rock art, the origins of world mythology, planetary history, spectacular nebular forms in deep space, and high energy electric discharges in the plasma laboratory -- all are inextricably linked by the Electric Model. In an extraordinary synthesis of the scientific disciplines THUNDERBOLTS presents us with an astonishing new perspective on ancient history and leading-edge astronomy.

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 7



PostPosted: March 10, 2007 4:34 AM 

[link]



Towards a new test of general relativity?


23 March 2006
Scientists funded by the European Space Agency believe they may have measured the gravitational equivalent of a magnetic field for the first time in a laboratory. Under certain special conditions the effect is much larger than expected from general relativity and could help physicists to make a significant step towards the long-sought-after quantum theory of gravity...........

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 8



PostPosted: March 20, 2007 5:09 AM 

[link]
This is a must see video even if you don't believe in Ufos, the footage is fantastic including the breaking of the space tether STS-75.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-75
The primary objective of STS-75 was to carry the Tethered Satellite System Reflight (TSS-1R) into orbit and to deploy it spaceward on a conducting tether. The mission also flew the United States Microgravity Payload (USMP-3) designed to investigate materials science and condensed matter physics.

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 9



PostPosted: March 23, 2007 12:01 AM 

This one is Mars . Smile

[link]

dx Author Profile Page


Posts: 1661

Reply: 10



PostPosted: March 23, 2007 7:41 AM 

Ixt>>>

thanks again, this is an very interesting Rover program update.

Seems like 'War of the Worlds' in reverse!!!!

yt
dx Wink Wink Shocked

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 11



PostPosted: March 23, 2007 1:23 PM 

HI dx,Thanks I was going to post to main forum but thought I might as well just keep this thread going it gives me somewhere to talk to myself Smile
Did you by any chance watch the space tether video ?
I would have really liked some feedback on that one as it is quite baffling the Jelly fish type objects or dust depending on whos looking,do look to be passing behind the tether which does indicate they are quite a size.
I rather hoped that people who know more about it might have chipped in .
Don't get me wrong I don't endorse what the guys saying I don't have the knowledge to know one way or the other but I was amazed at all the things that seemed to be going on ,and he made a fair enough case IMO so some explanations would be interesting .

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 12



PostPosted: March 24, 2007 4:55 AM 

Heres one explanation I found
http://www.rense.com/general/stsd.htm

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 13



PostPosted: March 24, 2007 5:48 AM 

A bit more on the tether incident

http://www.projectprove.com/Arts/075/075.php

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 14



PostPosted: March 25, 2007 2:53 AM 

_________________________________________________
Notes on the STS-80 UFOs" -- James Oberg January 1997

The STS-80 scenes seem to me to be identical in origin to the
infamous STS-48 scenes and to numerous others throughout the
shuttle flight program: low-light sensitive B&W cameras are
trained on the receding horizon during night passes, to observe
serendipitous lightning events for an experiment called
Mesoscale Lightning Experiment, managed out of NASA-MSFC in
Huntsville. You can see the dark horizon, the glowing 'air glow'
layer, moving stars, moving city lights below, lightning
flashes, and under moonlit conditions, dim clouds.

By the way, these low-light B&W cameras are pretty old and are
being replaced mission by mission -- the suite of cameras
carried by a shuttle (one in each corner of the payload bay, two
on the RMS, others perhaps mounted on the keel looking upwards
at target spacecraft, plus a few handheld units inside the
cabin) can be adjusted as needed, and a new color CCD camera is
much higher quality (it doesn't 'bloom' in overbright
reflections, and can't be damaged by sun exposure), but it's not
as sensitive in low light, so there are fewer opportunities to
see such views every year.

When sunrise occurs (due to the Orbiter's motion along its
orbit), even though the Orbiter is now bathed in sunlight, the
camera is still trained on the dark side of Earth. But now the
floating particles which routinely accompany every shuttle
flight (often ice particles, sometimes junk from the payload
bay, pieces of insulation blankets, a dozen or more distinctly
different sources) can become visible in the sunlight, sometimes
even moving into sunlight from the umbra of the Orbiter (and
thus "appearing suddenly"). These are close to the camera,
sometimes a few feet, at most a few hundred feet. Sometimes they
are hit by pulses of gas from the RCS jets as they automatically
fire to gently nudge the spaceship back towards a pre-set
orientation. Because of the sensitivity of the camera, moving
particles leave streaks -- even stars can be seen to do this
when the camera is being panned (usually by command from a
controller in the Mission Control Center). Tumbling particles
tend to flash. Bright particles overload the optics and appear
as "rings" or "do-nuts" with darker centers.

There's nothing else to it, as far as I can tell. Everyone in
the control center knows about this visual phenomenon, everyone
has seen it numerous times, and they laugh at notions these are
anomalous, while they grimace at yet more silly stories by
people who don't seem to understand much (or do seem to
misunderstand a lot) about "ordinary" space flight.

As far as I was able to determine, these STS-80 scenes were
recorded beginning about 11:55 PM PST on December 1, 1996.
That's 07:55 GMT on December 2. Since the shuttle was launched
on Nov 19, that is 324/19:55:47, this makes it about 12 days 11
hours 59 minutes "Mission Elapsed Time", or MET. This was on rev
197, crossing Venezuela, then the West Indies. The Orbiter
attitude was bottom forward, with the vehicle yawed somewhat so
the nose was off to one side.

According to the activity plan sent up that morning, the crew
was doing some evaluation of an EVA tool associated with their
airlock problems, and the two pilots were scheduled to begin a
review of landing procedures. Lunch was to follow. When I asked
crewman Story Musgrave, who is not shy about talking about
anomalies of any kind, he assured me he saw nothing unusual on
the flight, at this point or at any other.

The camera, "B" located at the rear of the payload bay, was in a
pre-set position which was later changed by ground commands.
Judging from the star motion at the horizon, it was looking
southwest, not precisely backwards (since then the stars would
have been setting straight down across the horizon). I don't
have the exact numbers on the camera's pan/tilt and it's too
much trouble to get them.

According to a computer reconstruction of the trajectory,
sunrise occurred at GMT 07:57. That's precisely when the picture
shows a slight foggy periphery, and when the first objects
appear. They keep showing up until about 08:01, when sunlit
clouds come into the camer's field of view and the iris
automatically stops way down so that the tiny objects (and stars
too) are no longer visible. The camera view continues in
daylight for long after that.

The crew's "Earth Obs Exposures" daily plan listed ground
targets which confirm this flight path:

12/11:54:05 Caracas
12/11:55:58 Montserrat

and then

12/12:19:34 Lake Nasser
12/12:21:13 Jiddah, Saudi Arabia
12/12:21:23 Mecca

These are "opportunities" only, not assignments, and apparently
nobody was free to take the shots over Caracas and Montserrat.

Here is some trajectory data from which you can reconstruct the
flight path and lighting conditions at the interval of interest,
if you have the commonly- available software.

M50 State Vector
GMT 337:00:54:47.00
MET 012:04:59:00
Position (ft)
X 7272023.0
Y -20753260.5
Z -2137127.9
Velocity (ft/sec)
VX 20614.669694
VY 8420.434295
VZ -11894.207423

At MET 12/11:55:47 for example, position is lat 15.07N, Lon
62.06W, alt 185.4nm, inertial velocity 25245.6034 ft/sec, the
orbital range is 183.8361 to 193.8737 nm, period 91:23.435, beta
angle -34 degrees (the sun is off to the right of the orbital
plane by this angle),

The video that I saw over in the Public Affairs Office was tape
#612710. If you want to specify it to buy your own copies, give
the MET or GMT times, and order ten minutes before and after the
interval, so you can see the typical phenomena of stars leaving
trails, and auto iris control functioning, and at one point the
constellation Orion going by, and at the end a view around the
Orbiter's sunlit payload bay. All very ordinary, unspectacular,
normal space views, in my opinion.

I don't know where the impression came from that this was a
rebroadcast of daily highlights, since these programs are
invariably short (10-15 minutes), with short clips jumping from
scene to scene, usually involving views of astronauts. This
sequence, on the other hand, was continuous for at least 20
minutes from the same camera, and the geography and lighting are
consistent with the real time orbital motion. I looked at the
"Flight Day Highlights" summary for three days around this date
and that's what they consisted of, with no replay of any of
these "dancing dots" scenes (why should there have been?).

I don't expect that this will change many minds and I don't
intend to go on television to face some wild accusations that
I'm a paid liar for the grand conspiracy, and basically I don't
take anyone seriously who takes these stories seriously. Life's
too short for me to care what some people want to believe these
scenes show. I've already spent too much time, but I figured
somebody had to make a rational response, whether it was
understood and believed, or not.

___________

James Oberg

http://www.jamesoberg.com.

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 15



PostPosted: March 31, 2007 2:55 PM 

Not Mars but Somalia:

http://www.shabelle.net/news/ne2633.htm#

A mysterious aerial device falls in Somalia.
By: Mohamed Amiin.

Mogadishu 26, March.07 ( Sh.M.Network) A mysterious device looking like a satellite or UFO has landed and spotted near buulo burde town in south Somalia.

Villagers report that the device fell five days ago in area which lies forty kilo meters north of Buulo burde town.

The device is occupying in an area of one hundred Meters Square as villagers who spotted this device confirmed to Shabelle Radio.

“In the evening of last Wednesday, a large device flew over our head and moments later, we heard a large sound, BAM” said Ilyas Ali, a villager who lives nearby where this large device has fallen.

Ilyas spoke of the device, telling that in the daylight it glitters and in a nighttime, it turns lights and speaks a strange language which can’t be understood by the villagers.

The impact of the unidentified device has killed a camel which was grazing nearby.

Because of the remote area it fell, news of the device is emerging gradually now despite its fall of five days ago.

Shabelle Media Network Somalia

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 16



PostPosted: April 6, 2007 2:08 PM 

Earth's bigger cousin' detected

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8206263/

KPM Author Profile Page


Posts: 836

Reply: 17



PostPosted: April 6, 2007 7:15 PM 

Life is every where ,,, it all happened in the fist split second......... light and time are pure History

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 18



PostPosted: April 14, 2007 7:24 PM 


Mars' moon Phobos could be the target for a technology trial that would seek to return rock samples to Earth.

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6324923.stm

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 19



PostPosted: May 22, 2007 7:09 PM 

Flight Into Mariner Valley

JPL Digital Image Animation Laboratory
3 min 50 sec - 8-Mar-2006


http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1622667251598627943&q=genre%3Aanimation

Ixt Author Profile Page


Posts: 388

Reply: 20



PostPosted: August 7, 2007 1:52 PM 

Saturn holds a tiny secret.

Icy chasms on one of Saturn's most humble moons, hidden amid its glorious rings, have overtaken the sands of Mars and the stratosphere of Venus as the most intriguing potential hiding place for alien life in our solar system..........

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2007-07-22-saturn-enceladus-life_N.htm?csp=34

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next


Join the conversation:















Very Happy Smile Sad Surprised
Shocked Confused Cool Laughing
Mad Razz Embarassed Crying or Very Sad
Evil or Very Mad Twisted Evil Rolling Eyes Wink
Powered by MTSmileys