Scientific reputations

Author Message

PostPosted: March 25, 2005 3:55 AM 

Makes you realize why scientists are so chary about making any claims about life on Mars. In this environment you play your cards close to your chest:


Posts: no

Reply: 1

PostPosted: March 30, 2005 3:52 PM 

Thanks for posting that link, from the perspective of a scientist, the following statements are profound:

Your success as a scientist depends upon your reputation — your reputation for caution, your reputation for correctness, for publishing the truth, for not making claims you can’t substantiate. If your reputation gets tarnished then that affects your ability to be competitive in the scientific community.”

A scientist must successfully compete in order to survive, Stoker explains. “You compete for your funding, for your salary, for example, the salary of your staff,” she says. “You make applications to do projects, you write proposals, they get reviewed by panels of your peers, you pass or fail.....

So, maybe these quotes help a few understand why former posters on this blog became so aggravated at times attempting to discuss science, in a generally accepted science manner, with others. But, that said, we all know going in this is not a science format and any absurd statement gets posted.

Raptor Witness

Posts: 2255

Reply: 2

PostPosted: March 31, 2005 10:36 PM 

Mars is a bone bed. Everyone needs to get over it and let's see the monsters.


Posts: no

Reply: 3

PostPosted: March 31, 2005 11:19 PM 

The problem is that a lot of "science journalists" are pretty science illiterate and work to very close deadlines and so sometimes the scientists don't get to check what will be printed... and then there ones who just want to sensationalize. My experience with journalists has however been very positive. Sometimes they just print your press release with their name attached...


Posts: no

Reply: 4

PostPosted: June 25, 2005 7:43 PM 

Hello I dont know what this is but HI Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy


Posts: 248

Reply: 5

PostPosted: June 26, 2005 12:23 AM 

this reminds me of the hockey stick graph for the global warming senario. Playing with numbers while excluding others to acheive a desired result is bad science.

Raptor Witness

Posts: 2255

Reply: 6

PostPosted: June 26, 2005 1:53 AM 


I'd rather argue the absurd then watch a bunch of formal scientists call a press conference and gloat over how to lie to the public.


Posts: no

Reply: 7

PostPosted: June 27, 2005 11:41 AM 

And nobody can "argue the absurd" like you RW.

By following scientific methods laid out in the contents of the msnbc article, NASA may someday announce your "bone bed" on Mars. Feel welcome to hold your breath as we wait..... Wink

Raptor Witness

Posts: 2255

Reply: 8

PostPosted: June 27, 2005 8:34 PM 

There are more than bones. There are rocks which like the sunshine.

Raptor Witness

Posts: 2255

Reply: 9

PostPosted: June 28, 2005 8:37 PM 

NASA has a saying after an accident ... "Lock the doors." Which simply means don't comment or speculate. We accidentally found life on Mars.

RW Author Profile Page

Posts: 60

Reply: 10

PostPosted: May 7, 2007 2:10 PM 

The plague first announced [here,] and underlined and extended on [May 2,] are keys to another kind of door.

RW Author Profile Page

Posts: 60

Reply: 11

PostPosted: May 7, 2007 3:07 PM 

Remember the number four St. NASA.


Posts: 131

Reply: 12

PostPosted: August 13, 2007 1:08 PM 

Timing gentlemen, is everything, when God gets involved ...

"Like a plague of locusts shall calamity fall upon the NASArites, eating away at every piece of equipment under their control. Flukes shall become much more than [a whale's tail.] Coincidence, many times the toss of a coin, and you will know that it was the Creator of all things that has sent you this plague." - [May 2, 2007 - Post #4]

[Inspection shows tile gouge almost reaches shuttle skin - 8-13-07]

Aldebaran Author Profile Page

Posts: 315

Reply: 13

PostPosted: August 20, 2007 12:23 AM 

Aw! Bad luck. Keep trying and eventually you'll get a prophecy right one of these days. Hurricanes are quite a sure bet at the moment because of increased sea temperatures caused by anthropogenic global warming. Eventually a hurricane is bound to affect some of NASA's facilities in Texas or Florida, so it''s a pretty sure bet.

Ever since the ocean temperature differential increased above an SST of 0.5 degrees C (about 1994), the incidence of severe storms in the Caribbean has increased, and it's not going to get better any time soon.

It's quite easy to recognise the hand of mankind in this.

Keep trying! The odds are in your favour.


Posts: 624

Reply: 14

PostPosted: September 26, 2007 1:10 PM 

Sarkozy a raison ...


Posts: 111

Reply: 15

PostPosted: December 21, 2007 3:46 PM 

["One, for each of her wings. To the state of confusion, I send the torrential bee."] - May 11, 2007


Posts: 1471

Reply: 16

PostPosted: February 1, 2008 9:50 AM 

Arizona St, re:1

"generally accepted science manner"

The result of scientific mutual censorship is, that overtime pseudoscience has had hijacked science.

You can look anywhere: Physics, Computer Science, Philosophy, Nanotech, etc.

The fear of falling in disrepute is very strong among the science publishers also, so they hide behind the peer review...

e Cool s


Posts: xxx

Reply: 17

PostPosted: September 29, 2014 10:40 PM 

Hello! , , , ,

Join the conversation:

Very Happy Smile Sad Surprised
Shocked Confused Cool Laughing
Mad Razz Embarassed Crying or Very Sad
Evil or Very Mad Twisted Evil Rolling Eyes Wink
Powered by MTSmileys