Mars News - Page 5

Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next
Author Message
Joe Smith


Posts: xxx

Reply: 81



PostPosted: November 17, 2018 10:25 PM 

WE ARE COMING SOON

https://www.engadget.com/2018/11/17/spacex-drops-plans-to-make-falcon-9-rockets-more-reusable/?guccounter=1

Joe Smith


Posts: xxx

Reply: 82



PostPosted: November 19, 2018 6:27 PM 


Barsoomer


Posts: 344

Reply: 83



PostPosted: November 20, 2018 1:58 AM 

nasa-picks-jezero-crater-landing-site-for-next-mars-rover

Jezero Crater for Mars2020 rover.

Joe Smith


Posts: xxx

Reply: 84



PostPosted: November 20, 2018 8:30 PM 

[link] ?utm_source=ls-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20181119-ls

Faceless


Posts: 24

Reply: 85



PostPosted: November 21, 2018 12:57 AM 

Bill Nye to Elon Musk: Humans unable to live on Mars for long.
https://qz.com/1470080/elon-musk-should-listen-to-bill-nye-and-give-up-on-colonizing-mars/

John Radogno


Posts: xxx

Reply: 86



PostPosted: November 21, 2018 11:06 AM 

Barsoomer,
Re: 83 - looks like an interesting place to land.

Joe Smith


Posts: xxx

Reply: 87



PostPosted: November 23, 2018 9:02 PM 

BAD NEWS!!!!!!!


One of NASA's Mars Exploration Tools Has a Glitch That Created The Illusion of Water

The link wont attach,,,,, use google

John Radogno


Posts: xxx

Reply: 88



PostPosted: November 23, 2018 10:20 PM 

It is not horrible news, it just a complication in detections of perchlorates over a few pixels in resolution. Perchlorates are on the planet, but from orbit it is more difficult to identify exact locations, which makes it harder to know where to land a rover. There is water on the planet.

Joe Smith


Posts: xxx

Reply: 89



PostPosted: November 25, 2018 6:23 PM 

whew....thanks John..
joe

Barsoomer


Posts: 344

Reply: 90



PostPosted: November 28, 2018 1:21 AM 

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-administrator-to-announce-new-moon-to-mars-partnerships-with-us-companies

link

Press conference on Thursday to announce return to Moon surface as step towards Mars.

Joe Smith


Posts: xxx

Reply: 91



PostPosted: December 10, 2018 7:22 AM 

https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/a4l6pp/the_new_design_is_metal_could_spacex_be_using/

mazebo


Posts: xxx

Reply: 92



PostPosted: December 21, 2018 10:01 AM 

Merry Christmas!

http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Images/2018/12/Perspective_view_of_Korolev_crater

It's a white one on Mars!

mazebo

John Radogno


Posts: xxx

Reply: 93



PostPosted: December 21, 2018 11:41 AM 

gazebo, thanks for the holiday picture!

Barsoomer


Posts: 344

Reply: 94



PostPosted: January 17, 2019 11:00 PM 

lifeonmars2019_program

Workshop about searching for extant (current) life on Mars.

The topic is going mainstream!

John Radogno


Posts: 37

Reply: 95



PostPosted: January 18, 2019 12:04 AM 

Barsoomer, Thanks for the link. I just started looking through this stuff and am pretty sure I will be on it for the next couple of days. Lots of interesting stuff!

Joe Smith


Posts: xxx

Reply: 96



PostPosted: January 20, 2019 9:25 PM 

....many many thanks BS....everything Winston talks about recently,,

Dana Johnson


Posts: 1195

Reply: 97



PostPosted: January 31, 2019 5:57 PM 

I was wrongly prevented from posting this link incidental to a reference advocating wide inclusion of interpretations of research on this blog, and would like the comment to be issued wherever it is stored as blocked.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=webhp&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjr4LieipngAhUS1qwKHUnZDbMQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Fscientists-reveal-nature-of-martian-mountain-using-inge-1832227606&psig=AOvVaw2RSZcqlMES_xS2xPxOiRw8&ust=1549060513576755

John Radogno


Posts: 37

Reply: 98



PostPosted: February 1, 2019 11:06 AM 

Dana, I can't imagine any reason why your post would be blocked. Over the years we have had a lot of garbage posted that should not have been allowed. There is nothing controversial about the interpretations of research, and the proposed ideas for making gravity measurements to judge density are well founded. It is common for impact craters to have a bounce back cone in the middle of them and the idea that Mount Sharp was further built up by lower sediments being blown up, is not new at all. The article just gives more credence to the idea. Maybe I am missing something about this post but I am glad you posted it!

I like the image included in the article. In the distance it looks like a stream bed cutting through the hills and flowing into a basin.

Danqa Johnson


Posts: 1195

Reply: 99



PostPosted: February 4, 2019 9:33 AM 

My attempt to induce r lewis to return with various links was responded to by a 'too many posts in a short time', and the daily routine 'submission error' pages. That is the eternal routine for my posting in most all topics. One entry per day led to that.
I haven't read the research as yet, but the abstract indicated the lack of rebound as a explanation. Probably a simplification misdirection in the story. Good use of the instruments.
I find it difficult to believe that even spherical shells could produce the stregth of titanium and greater, ref. reply #3 on 'Farwell'.
Since the argument was introduced tha upward growth of layers could be occurring by activity underground, I was baiting someone to suggest evacuation as a method of less density, added to the obvious surface deep removal and separation of layers in areas at gale.

[link]

John Radogno


Posts: 37

Reply: 100



PostPosted: February 4, 2019 2:57 PM 

The way I understood it as that the porosity of the surface of Gale Crater disproves the idea that it was once buried under large volumes of rock.

Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next


Join the conversation:















Very Happy Smile Sad Surprised
Shocked Confused Cool Laughing
Mad Razz Embarassed Crying or Very Sad
Evil or Very Mad Twisted Evil Rolling Eyes Wink
Powered by MTSmileys